Extrageographic Online


Extrageographic search help

People, places, links and content.

You are in: Extrageographic > Magazine > Travel > Stewart Dillon in China: One
Home
Magazine
Index
Arts
Features
Travel
Market
Place Index
Our Amazon
Books
CDs
DVDs
Web
Directory
Sites to visit
About
Details
Contact

Search this page
Press: Ctrl+F


 
Stewart Dillon in China: Notes one
14 September 2002

I am writing this on Saturday at 9.00 p.m. in my local KFC. Over the past few days I have eaten the same amount of Kentucky Fried Chicken as I did in my entire life in England.

 
  Photos by Stewart Dillon
I blame my students for this. A rumour was started that I was a great fan of KFC and now they insist on giving me an endless supply of KFC vouchers which I feel obliged to use. The voucher system is a simple yet elegant idea.

The participant is given 2 sheets of paper. One sheet contains stickers of various KFC products. The stickers come in 3 shapes; triangle (equilateral to be precise), circle and square. The other sheet contains combinations of shapes, each combination having a set monetary value. Thus a circle and square is worth 8 RMB whilst a triangle and square is worth 11 RMB.

Describing this reminds me of those Dennis Wheatley novels (do people in England still read Dennis Wheatley?) I read when I was about 10 years old, the ones about the occult. The characters would go around telling other characters how many "circles and squares" they possessed; this had something to do with how good they were at the occult.

20 years later I cannot remember whether it was the number of circles or squares that was important. Not that I care; Dennis Wheatley represented all that was bad about the mind-set of the English upper class and having a central character called the Duc de Richlieu just made it worse.

Returning to the voucher system. What makes it so captivating is that it removes all need for communication. You hand over the vouchers and money and wait for the food. You don't have to speak. You don't even have to point or mime. I had promised myself that when the current series of vouchers had expired I would stop coming to KFC.

Naturally what has now happened is that my students have already started giving me vouchers for the next promotion. I don't know whether to laugh or cry.

What makes this ironic is that I happen to live (literally) right across the road from a branch of McDonald's. The KFC is my local in that it is a 10-minute walk from my school but it is a 90-minute walk from my apartment, which is what I am faced with when the buses have stopped running.

Why do I make life difficult for myself when I could as easily sit in McDonald's being annoyed by people wishing to practise their English on me? The reason is simple. McDonald's does not have a voucher system to compare with KFC's. They do have vouchers but inexplicably the vouchers focus exclusively on their chicken products.

I have yet to meet a Chinese person who would extol the virtues of chicken from McDonald's over chicken from KFC. It appears McDonald's are in a Catch-22 situation. They have correctly identified that the money in the Chinese fast-food market is to be made from chicken and yet they are forced to go up against a company whose raison d'etre is fast-food chicken.

I do not live for chicken but if I have to eat it I would rather put my trust (and money) in a company whose speciality is chicken. If McDonald's were giving out vouchers for Sausage McMuffins or cheeseburgers I would be writing this in McDonald's, but while the choice is chicken or chicken I'm sticking with KFC.

Given the importance of chicken in the Chinese diet, KFC was always going to have an edge over Mcdonald's but the voucher system also plays an important part in its success. The Chinese are often thought of as conformists but give them the chance to decide on a chicken filet burger or a bag of chicken "popcorn" and they can't get enough.

The only losers in the scheme are the unfortunate members of staff who have to tally up the number of vouchers used. You can see them hunched over a table at 11.00 p.m. ploughing through piles of coloured paper.

I am grateful just to be able to eat recognizable parts of a chicken. I don't mind grilled chicken hearts on a stick (meat-on-a-stick is a wide spread but little-mentioned part of Chinese cuisine) or even a chewy chicken neck (though the taste takes getting used to) but I draw the line at chicken's feet. Not only does it look unappealing but there is precious little meat on one.

I am now well used to having dinner with a group of people and being presented with an entire chicken on a plate. As long as I avoid its eye I can take a slice out of its middle with superb composure.

This is never a problem with the fish-in-its-entirety; the eyes are usually the first thing to go.

NOTE: "McDonalds" or "McDonald's " ? "McDonald's" or "McDonalds " ? The spelling is all important. I checked the McDonald's web site, which solved one question but raised another; why is there no listing for China in the country listings?

KFC in China has its own web site. Maybe the chicken isn't the only reason McDonald's are lagging behind?)

(Copyright © Stewart Dillon 14.09.02.)

Stewart is a journalist and english teacher living in China. You can contact him at stupaud@yahoo.com

 
  AddThis Social Bookmark Button
   
  See also:
  Alex
  Dating: Alex's advice
   
 
Happy
Adventure
  Arts: Cartoons
   
  Applicants
  Interview: Applicants
   
 
Dean's
Guide
  Travel: Hamburg
   
 
  Market: Our Amazon
   
  Ads by Extrageographic
 

Goldcrests
Gifts and Goods

Ideal holiday gifts,
Clothes and more


 
© 1996-2008 Extrageographic. All rights reserved. | Website help | Search this website | To bookmark page, press: Ctrl+D | Search this page: Ctrl+F